Commonwealth v. Pregrad

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Pregrad

303 A.2d 851, 8 Pa. Commw. 500, 1973 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 750

CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 30, 1973

DocketAppeal, No. 1030 C.D. 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 303 A.2d 851 (Commonwealth v. Pregrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Pregrad, 303 A.2d 851, 8 Pa. Commw. 500, 1973 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 750 (Pa. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

On February 27, 1970, Pennsylvania State Police Trooper Howard L. McMurtrie arrested David A. Pregrad (appellee) for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, a violation of Section 1037 of The Vehicle Code, Act of April 29, 1959, P. L. 58, as amended (Code), 75 P.S. §1037. After being placed under arrest, appellee was requested on three separate occasions, during the period of one hour, to submit to a breathalyzer test as provided in the so-called “Implied Consent Law,” Section 624.1(a)¹ of the Code, 75 P.S. §624.1 (a). On each, of these occasions appellee refused to submit to the breathalyzer test.²

Having received a report of this refusal, the Secretary of Transportation, under Section 624.1(a), suspended appellee’s operator’s license for three months, effective April 7, 1970. The Court of Common Pleas of [502]*502Westmoreland County, after granting a supersedeas on April 7, 1970, held a hearing on September 25, 1972 and sustained appellee’s appeal and reversed the Secretary’s suspension. The Commonwealth appealed to this Court.

The only reason for the lower court’s ruling was that “[a]fter a non-jury trial, the defendant [appellee] was found not guilty of violation of Section 1037 of the Motor Vehicle Code.” We realize that the lower court did not have the benefit of our recent decision in Commonwealth v. Abraham, 7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 535, 300 A. 2d 831 (1973). In Abraham we held that despite the fact that the criminal charge (operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor) was dismissed, there remained the separate refusal to take the breathalyzer test, the suspension for which was a civil proceeding and within the power of the Secretary to impose in accord with Section 624.1 (a) of the Code, 75 P.S. §624.1 (a).

Therefore, we conclude here, as we did in the nearly identical and companion case of Commonwealth v. Everett, 8 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 502, 303 A. 2d 850 (1973), that Commonwealth v. Abraham, supra, controls. The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County is reversed and the order of the Secretary of Transportation is reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

On February 27, 1970, Pennsylvania State Police Trooper Howard L. McMurtrie arrested David A. Pregrad (appellee) for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, a violation of Section 1037 of The Vehicle Code, Act of April 29, 1959, P. L. 58, as amended (Code), 75 P.S. §1037. After being placed under arrest, appellee was requested on three separate occasions, during the period of one hour, to submit to a breathalyzer test as provided in the so-called “Implied Consent Law,” Section 624.1(a)¹ of the Code, 75 P.S. §624.1 (a). On each, of these occasions appellee refused to submit to the breathalyzer test.²

Having received a report of this refusal, the Secretary of Transportation, under Section 624.1(a), suspended appellee’s operator’s license for three months, effective April 7, 1970. The Court of Common Pleas of [502]*502Westmoreland County, after granting a supersedeas on April 7, 1970, held a hearing on September 25, 1972 and sustained appellee’s appeal and reversed the Secretary’s suspension. The Commonwealth appealed to this Court.

The only reason for the lower court’s ruling was that “[a]fter a non-jury trial, the defendant [appellee] was found not guilty of violation of Section 1037 of the Motor Vehicle Code.” We realize that the lower court did not have the benefit of our recent decision in Commonwealth v. Abraham, 7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 535, 300 A. 2d 831 (1973). In Abraham we held that despite the fact that the criminal charge (operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor) was dismissed, there remained the separate refusal to take the breathalyzer test, the suspension for which was a civil proceeding and within the power of the Secretary to impose in accord with Section 624.1 (a) of the Code, 75 P.S. §624.1 (a).

Therefore, we conclude here, as we did in the nearly identical and companion case of Commonwealth v. Everett, 8 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 502, 303 A. 2d 850 (1973), that Commonwealth v. Abraham, supra, controls. The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County is reversed and the order of the Secretary of Transportation is reinstated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.2d 851, 8 Pa. Commw. 500, 1973 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-pregrad-pacommwct-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack