Commonwealth v. Portis, J., of: Goldstein, Z.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 20, 2020·No. 10 EM 2020·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 10 EM 2020 :

:

v. :

:

:

JEROME PORTIS :

:

:

PETITION OF: ZAK T. GOLDSTEIN, ESQ. :

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2020, upon consideration of the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, the matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County for that court to determine whether Jerome Portis’s present counsel should be permitted to withdraw.

If present counsel is allowed to withdraw, the court is DIRECTED to resolve any issues relative to Jerome Portis being appointed counsel or granted leave to proceed pro se.

The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to enter its order regarding this remand within 90 days after the expiration of the judicial emergency declared by this Court at 531 JAD and to promptly notify this Court of its determination.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Portis, J., of: Goldstein, Z., (Pa. 2020).

Commonwealth v. Portis, J., of: Goldstein, Z. (Commonwealth v. Portis, J., of: Goldstein, Z.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.