Commonwealth v. Pope

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Pope

379 A.2d 603, 250 Pa. Super. 626

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 26, 1977·No. Appeal, No. 1883·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The order of the lower court sustaining appellee’s post-trial motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence presented by the Commonwealth on the issue of appellee’s lack of a license is reversed for the reasons stated in Commonwealth v. Poindexter, 248 Pa.Superior Ct. 564, 375 A.2d 384 (1977). The record is remanded for consideration of remaining post-trial motions, if any. If the lower court decides that remaining post-trial motions are without merit, it shall proceed to judgment of sentence.

[627]*627HOFFMAN and SPAETH, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the concurring and dissenting opinion of HOFFMAN, J., in Commonwealth v. Poindexter, 248 Pa.Superior Ct. 564, 375 A.2d 384 (1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The order of the lower court sustaining appellee’s post-trial motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence presented by the Commonwealth on the issue of appellee’s lack of a license is reversed for the reasons stated in Commonwealth v. Poindexter, 248 Pa.Superior Ct. 564, 375 A.2d 384 (1977). The record is remanded for consideration of remaining post-trial motions, if any. If the lower court decides that remaining post-trial motions are without merit, it shall proceed to judgment of sentence.

[627]*627HOFFMAN and SPAETH, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the concurring and dissenting opinion of HOFFMAN, J., in Commonwealth v. Poindexter, 248 Pa.Superior Ct. 564, 375 A.2d 384 (1977).

Commonwealth v. Pope, 379 A.2d 603, 250 Pa. Super. 626 (Pa. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

379 A.2d 603 (Commonwealth v. Pope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related