Commonwealth v. Pope

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Pope

379 A.2d 603, 250 Pa. Super. 626

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 26, 1977

DocketAppeal, No. 1883

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 379 A.2d 603 (Commonwealth v. Pope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Pope, 379 A.2d 603, 250 Pa. Super. 626 (Pa. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The order of the lower court sustaining appellee’s post-trial motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence presented by the Commonwealth on the issue of appellee’s lack of a license is reversed for the reasons stated in Commonwealth v. Poindexter, 248 Pa.Superior Ct. 564, 375 A.2d 384 (1977). The record is remanded for consideration of remaining post-trial motions, if any. If the lower court decides that remaining post-trial motions are without merit, it shall proceed to judgment of sentence.

[627]*627HOFFMAN and SPAETH, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the concurring and dissenting opinion of HOFFMAN, J., in Commonwealth v. Poindexter, 248 Pa.Superior Ct. 564, 375 A.2d 384 (1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The order of the lower court sustaining appellee’s post-trial motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence presented by the Commonwealth on the issue of appellee’s lack of a license is reversed for the reasons stated in Commonwealth v. Poindexter, 248 Pa.Superior Ct. 564, 375 A.2d 384 (1977). The record is remanded for consideration of remaining post-trial motions, if any. If the lower court decides that remaining post-trial motions are without merit, it shall proceed to judgment of sentence.

[627]*627HOFFMAN and SPAETH, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the concurring and dissenting opinion of HOFFMAN, J., in Commonwealth v. Poindexter, 248 Pa.Superior Ct. 564, 375 A.2d 384 (1977).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

379 A.2d 603, 250 Pa. Super. 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-pope-pasuperct-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack