Commonwealth v. Poage

993 A.2d 873
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 26, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 993 A.2d 873 (Commonwealth v. Poage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Poage, 993 A.2d 873 (Pa. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Superior Court’s Order is REVERSED, and Petitioner’s judgment of sentence is VACATED. The matter is REMANDED to the trial court for resen-tencing pursuant to this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Haag, 603 Pa. 46, 981 A.2d 902 (2009).

Petitioner’s Motion to Consolidate Petitions for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Haag
981 A.2d 902 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
993 A.2d 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-poage-pa-2010.