Commonwealth v. Phipps
This text of 5 Ky. Op. 759 (Commonwealth v. Phipps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
One of the reasons for which an indictment may be set aside is a substantial error in the summoning or formation of the grand jury. Criminal Code, Section 159.
Section 1, Article 1, Chapter 55, Revised Statutes, provides that a civil officer shall not be competent to serve upon a grand jury.
A processioner of lands is a civil officer. R. S., Chapter 60, Section 2.
As one of the grand jurors finding the indictment in this case was a processioner of lands, the court did not err in setting said indictment aside.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Ky. Op. 759, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-phipps-kyctapp-1872.