Commonwealth v. Pflaum
84 A. 842, 236 Pa. 294, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 749
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 29, 1912·No. Appeal, No. 148·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
In the opinion of a majority of this court the judgment appealed from should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Pflaum, 84 A. 842, 236 Pa. 294, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 749 (Pa. 1912).
84 A. 842 (Commonwealth v. Pflaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cott Beverage Corp. v. Horst
110 A.2d 405 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Speck v. Philips
51 A.2d 399 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Philadelphia Ass'n of Linen Suppliers v. Philadelphia
12 A.2d 189 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Nock v. Coca Cola Bot. Wks. Pgh.
156 A. 537 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Crackerjack Co. v. City of Chicago
161 N.E. 479 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1928)
Longbrake v. State
146 N.E. 417 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1925)
Commonwealth v. Liberty Products Co.
84 Pa. Super. 473 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Harkey v. State
234 S.W. 221 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Nolan v. Jones
106 A. 235 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. Cannon
132 Tenn. 419 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1915)
Commonwealth v. Young
57 Pa. Super. 521 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)