Commonwealth v. Perry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Perry

994 A.2d 1078, 606 Pa. 41, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 986

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Perry. Read the opinion of the Court — 612 Pa. 557 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 5, 2010·No. 95 EAL 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue *42 set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) “Whether the Superior Court failed to apply the proper standard of review under Commonwealth v. Walls, 592 Pa. 557, 926 A.2d 957 (2007), when it vacated the judgment of sentence of 2$ to 5 years’ imprisonment imposed for a violation of the Uniform Firearms Act?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue *42 set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) “Whether the Superior Court failed to apply the proper standard of review under Commonwealth v. Walls, 592 Pa. 557, 926 A.2d 957 (2007), when it vacated the judgment of sentence of 2$ to 5 years’ imprisonment imposed for a violation of the Uniform Firearms Act?”

Commonwealth v. Perry, 994 A.2d 1078, 606 Pa. 41, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 986 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

994 A.2d 1078 (Commonwealth v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related