Commonwealth v. Perretta-Rosepink

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Perretta-Rosepink

166 A.3d 1214, 2017 WL 527720, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 294

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 9, 2017·No. No. 194 MAL 2015·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of February, 2017, issue b. set forth in the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Order of the Superior Court regarding this issue is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court to reconsider its decision in light of Commonwealth v. Veon, 150 A.3d. 435 (Pa. 2016) (69 and 70 MAP 2015).

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of February, 2017, issue b. set forth in the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Order of the Superior Court regarding this issue is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court to reconsider its decision in light of Commonwealth v. Veon, 150 A.3d. 435 (Pa. 2016) (69 and 70 MAP 2015).

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Commonwealth v. Perretta-Rosepink, 166 A.3d 1214, 2017 WL 527720, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 294 (Pa. 2017).

Pincite

166 A.3d 1214 (Commonwealth v. Perretta-Rosepink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.