Commonwealth v. Perfetto, M.
182 A.3d 435
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 27, 2018·No. 455 EAL 2017 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
AND NOW, this 27 th day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:
(1) Whether [the] Superior Court erred in determining that [the] Philadelphia Municipal Court - Traffic Division has sole jurisdiction over summary traffic offenses even when those charges are part of a single incident which also includes a misdemeanor and/or felony charges? Is this decision in conflict with 18 Pa.C.S. § 110, the 2002 amendment thereto removing jurisdiction as an element of the offense, its constitutional underpinnings, and decisions of this Court?
(2) Where the lower [c]ourt dismissed the prosecution under 18 Pa.C.S. § 110 because all the prongs of the test for dismissal under that statute were met, did the trial [c]ourt properly dismiss the charges?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Perfetto, M., 182 A.3d 435 (Pa. 2018).
182 A.3d 435 (Commonwealth v. Perfetto, M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Perfetto, M., Aplt.
207 A.3d 812 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2019)
Com. v. Nichols, W.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2019