Commonwealth v. Perez

848 A.2d 917
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 22, 2004
StatusPublished

This text of 848 A.2d 917 (Commonwealth v. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Perez, 848 A.2d 917 (Pa. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Did the Superior Court err by finding that, although the trial court gave an inapplicable instruction to the jury, Petitioner was not prejudiced by his counsel’s failure to object, where the trial court’s instruction permitted the jury to find Petitioner guilty of first-degree murder without finding that Petitioner possessed the specific intent to kill?

In this respect only, the Superior Court’s Order is VACATED. This appeal is DISMISSED, without prejudice to consideration of the above issue on collateral re[918]*918view. See Commonwealth v. Grant, 572 Pa. 48, 813 A.2d 726 (2002).

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Grant
813 A.2d 726 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
848 A.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-perez-pa-2004.