Commonwealth v. Perez

613 A.2d 536, 531 Pa. 361, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 414
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 17, 1992
DocketAppeal No. 41 E.D. Appeal Docket 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 613 A.2d 536 (Commonwealth v. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Perez, 613 A.2d 536, 531 Pa. 361, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 414 (Pa. 1992).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in Commonwealth v. Corporan, —— Pa. -, 613 A.2d 530 (1992), we affirm.

NIX, C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. [362]*362ZAPPALA, J., concurs in the result. CAPPY, J., notes his dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Corporan
613 A.2d 530 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
613 A.2d 536, 531 Pa. 361, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-perez-pa-1992.