Commonwealth v. Perez, C.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 2, 2020·No. 550 EAL 2019 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 550 EAL 2019 :

Petitioner :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

: :

CARLOS PEREZ, :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court misapply the standard for the evidentiary sufficiency of the Commonwealth’s prima facie case, as set forth by this Court in Commonwealth v. Karetny, 880 A.2d 505, 528 (Pa. 2005) and Commonwealth v. Huggins, 836 A.2d 862, 866 (Pa. 2003), effectively ruling that inferences may be drawn from the evidence in favor of defendant[s] at the preliminary hearing stage of a criminal proceeding and raising the burden of proof borne by the Commonwealth?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Perez, C., (Pa. 2020).

Commonwealth v. Perez, C. (Commonwealth v. Perez, C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Karetny
880 A.2d 505 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2005)
Commonwealth v. Huggins
836 A.2d 862 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)