Commonwealth v. Patton
952 A.2d 1166, 598 Pa. 8, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1019
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 27, 2008
Docket599 WAL 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 952 A.2d 1166 (Commonwealth v. Patton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Patton, 952 A.2d 1166, 598 Pa. 8, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1019 (Pa. 2008).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
"Whether the per se rule of Dejesus applies in non-capital cases; if not, was the within request improper and prejudicial?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Patton
985 A.2d 1283 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
952 A.2d 1166, 598 Pa. 8, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-patton-pa-2008.