Commonwealth v. Patton

952 A.2d 1166, 598 Pa. 8, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1019
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 27, 2008·No. 599 WAL 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

"Whether the per se rule of Dejesus applies in non-capital cases; if not, was the within request improper and prejudicial?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Patton, 952 A.2d 1166, 598 Pa. 8, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1019 (Pa. 2008).

952 A.2d 1166 (Commonwealth v. Patton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Patton
985 A.2d 1283 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)