Commonwealth v. Patterson

445 A.2d 191, 299 Pa. Super. 146, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4039
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 30, 1982·No. Appeal No. 870·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On March 12, 1981, appellant was adjudicated guilty of a summary offense after a trial de novo in a court of common pleas. He filed no post-trial motions before taking this appeal. In Commonwealth v. Koch, 288 Pa. Superior Ct. 290, 431 A.2d 1052 (1981), we held that post-trial motions are a prerequisite to preserve issues for appellate review following such a trial de novo. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123. However, when no post-trial motions were filed and the adjudication occurred before July 1, 1981, we have remanded to allow appellant to file post-trial motions nunc pro tunc. E.g., Commonwealth v. Cruice, 297 Pa. Superior Ct. 1, 442 A.2d 1183 (1982); Commonwealth v. McNelis, 297 Pa. Superior Ct. 4, 442 A.2d 1184 (1982). Because appellant did not file post-trial motions but was convicted before July 1, 1981, we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand to allow him to file post-trial motions nunc pro tunc. Following the lower court’s ultimate disposition of those motions and entry of a final order, either party aggrieved may appeal as allowed by law.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Patterson, 445 A.2d 191, 299 Pa. Super. 146, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4039 (Pa. Ct. App. 1982).

445 A.2d 191 (Commonwealth v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Giugliano
464 A.2d 503 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Commonwealth v. Florida-Eastern U.S. Van Lines, Inc.
451 A.2d 749 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)