Commonwealth v. Patterson

369 A.2d 1163, 470 Pa. 618, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 560
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 28, 1977
Docket27 and 28
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 369 A.2d 1163 (Commonwealth v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Patterson, 369 A.2d 1163, 470 Pa. 618, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 560 (Pa. 1977).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellants, Charles Randolph Patterson and James Lewis Patterson, are brothers who pleaded guilty to murder on January 6, 1973. Following a degree of guilt hearing, appellants were found guilty of murder in the second degree and each was sentenced to serve ten to twenty years in prison. No post-verdict motions were filed and no appeal was taken.

On April 26, 1974, appellants filed separate but identical petitions under the Post Conviction Hearing Act. Both petitions, after alleging that appellants were without financial resources and were unable to employ an attorney, requested that an attorney be appointed to represent them. No attorney, however, was appointed. After the filing of answers to appellants’ petitions, the trial court on May 23, 1974, entered an order denying the petitions. Subsequently, the trial court appointed counsel to represent petitioners in the filing of an appeal to this Court from the denial of post-conviction relief.

Under the provisions of Rule 1503(a) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure (adopted January 24, 1968, and effective August 1, 1968) which superseded Section 12 of the Act of 1966, 19 P.S. 1180-12, supra, the trial court may not summarily dismiss a petition filed by an indigent under the Act of 1966, without the appointment of counsel, if counsel is requested, unless the same issues have been previously adjudicated adversely to the *620 petitioner in a counseled proceeding or one wherein he has knowingly waived his right to the assistance of counsel. See Commonwealth v. Blair, 470 Pa. 598, 369 A.2d 1153 (1977), and Commonwealth v. Adams, 465 Pa. 389, 350 A.2d 820 (1976).

Hence, the order appealed from is vacated and the record is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nicholson v. M & S Detective Agency, Inc.
503 A.2d 1106 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Commonwealth v. Lowenberg
425 A.2d 1100 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Commonwealth v. Daniels
420 A.2d 1323 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Sangricco
415 A.2d 65 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Thomas
408 A.2d 1148 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Commonwealth v. Mitchell
402 A.2d 1070 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Commonwealth v. Sinwell
393 A.2d 959 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Commonwealth v. King
384 A.2d 1314 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Commonwealth v. Brochu
378 A.2d 420 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Yocham
375 A.2d 325 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
369 A.2d 1163, 470 Pa. 618, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-patterson-pa-1977.