Commonwealth v. Pasture

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Pasture

77 A.3d 618, 621 Pa. 311, 2013 WL 5411067, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2207

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 27, 2013·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

[619] Following remand of this matter for reconsideration by the Superior Court in light of Commonwealth v. Perry, 612 Pa. 557, 32 A.3d 232 (2011), did the Superior Court, in purporting to distinguish Perry, disregard, for a second time, this Court’s directives in Perry and Commonwealth v. Walls, 592 Pa. 557, 926 A.2d 957 (2007)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

[619] Following remand of this matter for reconsideration by the Superior Court in light of Commonwealth v. Perry, 612 Pa. 557, 32 A.3d 232 (2011), did the Superior Court, in purporting to distinguish Perry, disregard, for a second time, this Court’s directives in Perry and Commonwealth v. Walls, 592 Pa. 557, 926 A.2d 957 (2007)?

Commonwealth v. Pasture, 77 A.3d 618, 621 Pa. 311, 2013 WL 5411067, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2207 (Pa. 2013).

Pincite

77 A.3d 618 (Commonwealth v. Pasture) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related