Commonwealth v. Parsons
This text of 66 A. 657 (Commonwealth v. Parsons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is conceded that judgment of ouster was properly entered against the defendant for the reasons that there was no properly constituted ward of the city of Scranton that he could represent as a school controller, and that there was no election district in which votes could be cast for him for this office. Whether the additional reason given by a majority of the court that the Act of April 28, 1903, P. L. 332, is both unconstitutional and void for uncertainty can be sustained, is a question not requiring decision at this time.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 A. 657, 217 Pa. 435, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-parsons-pa-1907.