Commonwealth v. Parker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Parker

257 A.2d 919, 216 Pa. Super. 723, 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 928

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Parker. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 Pa. Super. 334 →

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 30, 1969·No. Appeal, No. 15·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam :

In accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 426 Pa. 226, 232 A. 2d 623 (1967), the order is vacated and the record remanded to the court below with instructions to appoint counsel to represent appellant in a post-conviction proceeding at which his eligibility, on the present or an amended petition, for an evidentiary hearing and/or other relief may be determined.

Wright, P. J., would affirm the order below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam :

In accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 426 Pa. 226, 232 A. 2d 623 (1967), the order is vacated and the record remanded to the court below with instructions to appoint counsel to represent appellant in a post-conviction proceeding at which his eligibility, on the present or an amended petition, for an evidentiary hearing and/or other relief may be determined.

Wright, P. J., would affirm the order below.

Commonwealth v. Parker, 257 A.2d 919, 216 Pa. Super. 723, 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 928 (Pa. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

257 A.2d 919 (Commonwealth v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related