Commonwealth v. Parker

117 Mass. 112, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 170
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 6, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 117 Mass. 112 (Commonwealth v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Parker, 117 Mass. 112, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 170 (Mass. 1875).

Opinion

Morton, J.

The statute provides that “ whoever by the game of three-card monte, so called, or any other game, device, sleight of hand, pretensions to fortune telling, trick or other means whatever, by the use of cards, or other implements or instruments, fraudulently obtains from another person property of any description, shall be punished as in case of larceny of property of like value.” Gen. Sts. e. 161, § 57.

To sustain an indictment under this statute it must be shown that the defendant fraudulently obtained property of another by a game, device, trick or other means, using “ cards or other implements or instruments.”

The indictment in this case is broader than the statute. It charges that the defendant fraudulently obtained the property described, “by means of a game, device, sleight of hand and [114]*114trick, and by the use of cards and other implements, instruments and means.” Under this indictment it would not be necessary to prove that the defendant used cards or other implements or instruments, but he might be convicted by showing that he obtained the property by some trick or device, by the use of any other means, such as betting, or false representations or pretences.

The words “ and means ” cannot be rejected as surplusage ; they are not immaterial, but change the character of the acts charged. The indictment does not follow, but enlarges, the statute, and for this reason, without considering the other objections urged to it, we are of opinion that it is defective.

Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. Dunlap
190 S.W. 1041 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1916)
Whitman v. State
17 Neb. 224 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 Mass. 112, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-parker-mass-1875.