Commonwealth v. Page

72 Mass. 361
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1856
StatusPublished

This text of 72 Mass. 361 (Commonwealth v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Page, 72 Mass. 361 (Mass. 1856).

Opinion

Metcalf, J.

We are of opinion that Ely should not have been permitted to testify that he saw liquors in the defendant's shop, after the 12th of May. Such testimony was not admissible for the purpose of proving that liquors were there at an earlier day. Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 Mass. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-page-mass-1856.