Commonwealth v. Page
This text of 9 Ky. Op. 437 (Commonwealth v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The county judge should have required the father of the bastard child to enter into bond to perform the judgment of the court in the bastardy proceedings. But the bond accepted from the appellees did not conform to the statute, and they can be held only to its stipulations. The defendant did appear and render himself in obedience to the orders and process of the court, and thus exonerated his sureties from all liability. They did not undertake that he should perform the judgment of the court, and are not therefore responsible, because he has failed to do so.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Ky. Op. 437, 1877 Ky. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-page-kyctapp-1877.