Commonwealth v. Padilla

908 A.2d 265, 589 Pa. 247, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 1516
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 17, 2006·No. 13 WAP 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2006, the above captioned appeal is quashed as interlocutory and the Emergency Application for Stay is hereby dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Padilla, 908 A.2d 265, 589 Pa. 247, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 1516 (Pa. 2006).

908 A.2d 265 (Commonwealth v. Padilla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Padilla
80 A.3d 1238 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)