Commonwealth v. Packer, D.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Packer, D.

163 A.3d 962, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2735

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 5, 2016·No. 533 MAL 2016 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the prosecution prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Ms. Packer acted with sufficient malice when she became involved in a fatal motor vehicle accident after she “huffed” Dus1>-Off to support her convictions for [t]hird [d]egree [mjurder and Aggravated [a]ssault?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the prosecution prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Ms. Packer acted with sufficient malice when she became involved in a fatal motor vehicle accident after she “huffed” Dus1>-Off to support her convictions for [t]hird [d]egree [mjurder and Aggravated [a]ssault?

Commonwealth v. Packer, D., 163 A.3d 962, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2735 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

163 A.3d 962 (Commonwealth v. Packer, D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related