Commonwealth v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.
863 A.2d 1140, 581 Pa. 152, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 3154
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 22, 2004·No. Appeal No. 55 MAP 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2004, based on our per curiam affirmance of Canteen Corp. v. Commonwealth, 818 A.2d 594 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003), affirmed 578 Pa. 504, 854 A.2d 440 (2004), and because this case relies heavily on its reasoning and is factually indistinguishable, the en banc decision of the Commonwealth Court is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Osram Sylvania, Inc., 863 A.2d 1140, 581 Pa. 152, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 3154 (Pa. 2004).
863 A.2d 1140 (Commonwealth v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
ABB C-E Nuclear Power Inc. v. Director of Revenue
215 S.W.3d 85 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2007)