Commonwealth v. O'hearn, &8212 Com. v. Gleason

89 Pa. Super. 244, 1926 Pa. Super. LEXIS 41
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 16, 1926·No. Appeals 176 and 183·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Porter, P. J.,

These appeals, respectively, involve only the same questions which have been considered in opinions this day filed in the cases of Commonwealth v. Hunsinger and Cominonwealth v. Dabbiero, and for the reasons in those opinions stated, the assignments of error are overruled.

The judgments in these appeals are affirmed and the records remitted to the court below; and it is ordered that the defendants, respectively, appear in the court below at such time as they may be there called, and that they be by that court committed until they have complied with the sentence, or any part of it, which had not been performed at the time their respective appeals were made a supersedeas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. O'hearn, &8212 Com. v. Gleason, 89 Pa. Super. 244, 1926 Pa. Super. LEXIS 41 (Pa. Ct. App. 1926).

89 Pa. Super. 244 (Commonwealth v. O'hearn, &8212 Com. v. Gleason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Connolly
138 A. 682 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)