Commonwealth v. O'hearn, &8212 Com. v. Gleason
This text of 89 Pa. Super. 244 (Commonwealth v. O'hearn, &8212 Com. v. Gleason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
These appeals, respectively, involve only the same questions which have been considered in opinions this day filed in the cases of Commonwealth v. Hunsinger and Cominonwealth v. Dabbiero, and for the reasons in those opinions stated, the assignments of error are overruled.
The judgments in these appeals are affirmed and the records remitted to the court below; and it is ordered that the defendants, respectively, appear in the court below at such time as they may be there called, and that they be by that court committed until they have complied with the sentence, or any part of it, which had not been performed at the time their respective appeals were made a supersedeas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 Pa. Super. 244, 1926 Pa. Super. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-ohearn-8212-com-v-gleason-pasuperct-1926.