Commonwealth v. O'Hanlon
29 N.E. 518, 155 Mass. 198, 1892 Mass. LEXIS 279
Opinion
Under the complaint, the defendant could be convicted of two sales, and no more. The jury were instructed by the court to disregard all evidence of any sales except those relied on by the district attorney. It is to be presumed that they followed the instructions. It was within the discretion of the court to permit the district attorney to elect upon which sales he would rely. Commonwealth v. Bennett, 118 Mass. 443, 453.
The motion in arrest of judgment is disposed of by the case of Commonwealth v. Taber, ante, 5. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. O'Hanlon, 29 N.E. 518, 155 Mass. 198, 1892 Mass. LEXIS 279 (Mass. 1892).
29 N.E. 518 (Commonwealth v. O'Hanlon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estate of Berthiaume v. PRATT, MD
365 A.2d 792 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1976)
State v. Sievert
218 N.W. 871 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1928)
Commonwealth v. Coyne
92 N.E. 1028 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Hatcher & Shaw v. Commonwealth
55 S.E. 677 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1906)