Commonwealth v. O'Connor
This text of 77 Mass. 94 (Commonwealth v. O'Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence as to the drainer found in the defendant’s shop was competent to show the possession by the defendant of an usual implement in the sale of intoxicating liquor. It was competent for the defendant to meet this evidence by showing that the drainer was procured for a different purpose. The declaration made by the defendant, at the time of ordering the drainer to be made, of the purpose for which it was to be made, was competent as part of the res gestee, quali fying and explaining an act done. Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 Mass. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-oconnor-mass-1858.