Commonwealth v. Northrip

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Northrip

958 A.2d 1044

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Northrip. Read the opinion of the Court — 603 Pa. 544 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 16, 2008·No. 227 MAL 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the Commonwealth, is:

Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court erred by determining that Respondent’s conviction for Arson in the Third Degree, as defined in N.Y. Penal Law § 150.10, was not an equivalent offense to Arson as defined in the Pennsylvania Crimes Code at 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3301(a), and thus, not a crime of violence as defined by 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9714(g)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the Commonwealth, is:

Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court erred by determining that Respondent’s conviction for Arson in the Third Degree, as defined in N.Y. Penal Law § 150.10, was not an equivalent offense to Arson as defined in the Pennsylvania Crimes Code at 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3301(a), and thus, not a crime of violence as defined by 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9714(g)?

Commonwealth v. Northrip, 958 A.2d 1044 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

958 A.2d 1044 (Commonwealth v. Northrip) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related