Commonwealth v. Northrip

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Northrip

958 A.2d 1044, 598 Pa. 556, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1830

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 16, 2008

DocketAppeal No. 227 MAL 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 958 A.2d 1044 (Commonwealth v. Northrip) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Northrip, 958 A.2d 1044, 598 Pa. 556, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1830 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the Commonwealth, is:

Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court erred by determining that Respondent’s conviction for Arson in the Third Degree, as defined in N.Y. Penal Law § 150.10, was not an equivalent offense to Arson as defined in the Pennsylvania Crimes Code at 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3301(a), and thus, not a crime of violence as defined by 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9714(g)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the Commonwealth, is:

Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court erred by determining that Respondent’s conviction for Arson in the Third Degree, as defined in N.Y. Penal Law § 150.10, was not an equivalent offense to Arson as defined in the Pennsylvania Crimes Code at 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3301(a), and thus, not a crime of violence as defined by 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9714(g)?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

958 A.2d 1044, 598 Pa. 556, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-northrip-pa-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack