Commonwealth v. Nevels, C., Pet
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 49 WAL 2019 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : CHARLES F. NEVELS, III, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is denied as to Petitioner’s
remaining issue. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Whether the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to the charges of Retaliation Against Witnesses or Victim (18 Pa.C.S. § 4953(a)), where the evidence demonstrated that if Petitioner had retaliated against anyone, no such person had been party in a civil matter, but rather had testified or was about to testify in a criminal matter?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Nevels, C., Pet (Commonwealth v. Nevels, C., Pet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.