Commonwealth v. Neiman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Neiman

27 A.3d 984, 611 Pa. 419, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1805

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 10, 2011·No. 937 MAL 2010·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

1. Whether Pennsylvania [Act 152 of 2004] violates the single[-]subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.

2. Whether, if Act 152 violates the single-subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, Megan’s Law can be sustained by severance of the remaining portions of Act 152 of 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

1. Whether Pennsylvania [Act 152 of 2004] violates the single[-]subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.

2. Whether, if Act 152 violates the single-subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, Megan’s Law can be sustained by severance of the remaining portions of Act 152 of 2004.

Commonwealth v. Neiman, 27 A.3d 984, 611 Pa. 419, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1805 (Pa. 2011).

Pincite

27 A.3d 984 (Commonwealth v. Neiman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related