Commonwealth v. Neal
This text of 10 Mass. 152 (Commonwealth v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The general doctrine is, that a feme covert incurs no legal guilt by the commission of civil offences, by the coercion of her husband, or even when in his presence. To this general rule, there are certain exceptions, as of crimes forbidden by the law of nature, which are mala in fe, and some where the wife may be presumed the principal agent. The case at bar is not within the exceptions, and Elizabeth Neal is not guilty, and must therefore be discharged,
[163]*163ADDITIONAL NOTE.
[A married woman, living apart from her husband, may be indicted alone, and pun ished, for keeping a house of ill fame.— Com. vs. Lewis, 1 Metc. 181. — F. H.]
[In Sikes vs. Johnson M., (16 Mass. Rep. 389,) it was held, that a feme covert [163]*163might be charged as a trespasser for having procured the trespass to be committed, though not present when it was done. — Ed.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Mass. 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-neal-mass-1813.