Commonwealth v. Neal

10 Mass. 152
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 15, 1813·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Curia.

The general doctrine is, that a feme covert incurs no legal guilt by the commission of civil offences, by the coercion of her husband, or even when in his presence. To this general rule, there are certain exceptions, as of crimes forbidden by the law of nature, which are mala in fe, and some where the wife may be presumed the principal agent. The case at bar is not within the exceptions, and Elizabeth Neal is not guilty, and must therefore be discharged,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Neal, 10 Mass. 152 (Mass. 1813).

10 Mass. 152 (Commonwealth v. Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Patton
147 S.W.2d 467 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1941)
State v. Martini
78 A. 12 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1910)
Gill v. State
26 L.R.A. 655 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1894)
State v. Ma Foo
19 S.W. 222 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Luster v. State
23 Fla. 339 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1887)
State v. Shee
13 R.I. 535 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1882)
State v. Cleaves
59 Me. 298 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1871)
State v. . Williams
65 N.C. 398 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1871)
Commonwealth v. Wood
97 Mass. 225 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1867)
Wagener v. Bill
19 Barb. 321 (New York Supreme Court, 1855)