Commonwealth v. Myers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Myers

6 A.3d 1289

DecidedNovember 1, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.3d 1289 (Commonwealth v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Myers, 6 A.3d 1289 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2010, it appearing that Petitioner’s appointed counsel has never been granted leave to withdraw as counsel for Petitioner, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted, the order of the Superior Court is vacated, and the matter is remanded for a determination as to counsel’s status. If the PCRA court determines that Petitioner is entitled to counsel, counsel shall file a nunc pro tunc appeal from the order of the PCRA court within thirty days of the PCRA court’s order. If Petitioner is not entitled to counsel, the Superior Court shall enter a disposition upon Petitioner’s pro se appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2010, it appearing that Petitioner’s appointed counsel has never been granted leave to withdraw as counsel for Petitioner, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted, the order of the Superior Court is vacated, and the matter is remanded for a determination as to counsel’s status. If the PCRA court determines that Petitioner is entitled to counsel, counsel shall file a nunc pro tunc appeal from the order of the PCRA court within thirty days of the PCRA court’s order. If Petitioner is not entitled to counsel, the Superior Court shall enter a disposition upon Petitioner’s pro se appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.3d 1289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-myers-pa-2010.