Commonwealth v. Myers, D.

131 A.3d 480, 635 Pa. 60, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 151
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 3, 2016·No. 517 EAL 2015 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err in holding, in a published decision, that a warrant was required to obtain blood for a chemical test where the officer had probable cause to believe that the [Respondent] was driving under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance, and [Respondent] did not affirmatively refuse consent?
Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Myers, D., 131 A.3d 480, 635 Pa. 60, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 151 (Pa. 2016).

131 A.3d 480 (Commonwealth v. Myers, D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Myers, D.
164 A.3d 1162 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)