Commonwealth v. Myers, D.

131 A.3d 480, 635 Pa. 60, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 151
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 3, 2016
Docket517 EAL 2015 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 131 A.3d 480 (Commonwealth v. Myers, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Myers, D., 131 A.3d 480, 635 Pa. 60, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 151 (Pa. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err in holding, in a published decision, that a warrant was required to obtain blood for a chemical test where the officer had probable cause to believe that the [Respondent] was driving under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance, and [Respondent] did not affirmatively refuse consent?
Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Myers, D.
164 A.3d 1162 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 A.3d 480, 635 Pa. 60, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-myers-d-pa-2016.