Commonwealth v. Muth

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Muth

147 A.2d 169, 188 Pa. Super. 401, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 616

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 17, 1958·No. Appeal, No. 42·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

In this case it was stipulated by counsel that the testimony would be the same as in the case of Commonwealth v. Weik, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 391, 147 A. 2d 164, “except as to weights.” In the present case the evidence showed that the overweight was 5,010 pounds.

The decision in this case is controlled by the opinion filed herewith in Commonwealth v. Weik, supra.

The judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

In this case it was stipulated by counsel that the testimony would be the same as in the case of Commonwealth v. Weik, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 391, 147 A. 2d 164, “except as to weights.” In the present case the evidence showed that the overweight was 5,010 pounds.

The decision in this case is controlled by the opinion filed herewith in Commonwealth v. Weik, supra.

The judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Commonwealth v. Muth, 147 A.2d 169, 188 Pa. Super. 401, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 616 (Pa. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

147 A.2d 169 (Commonwealth v. Muth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related