Commonwealth v. Muth
This text of 147 A.2d 169 (Commonwealth v. Muth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion by
In this case it was stipulated by counsel that the testimony would be the same as in the case of Commonwealth v. Weik, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 391, 147 A. 2d 164, “except as to weights.” In the present case the evidence showed that the overweight was 5,010 pounds.
The decision in this case is controlled by the opinion filed herewith in Commonwealth v. Weik, supra.
The judgment of sentence is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 A.2d 169, 188 Pa. Super. 401, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-muth-pasuperct-1958.