Commonwealth v. Murphy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Murphy

45 Pa. Super. 193, 1911 Pa. Super. LEXIS 20

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 3, 1911

DocketNo. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 45 Pa. Super. 193 (Commonwealth v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Murphy, 45 Pa. Super. 193, 1911 Pa. Super. LEXIS 20 (Pa. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion bt

Rice, P. J.,

The questions raised in this case are precisely the same as those raised in the Jones case in which we herewith file an opinion, ante, p. 185.

The petitioner, William E. Grow, is remanded to the custody of the warden of the Schuylkill county prison To serve out so much of his sentence as had not expired on May 25, 1910, the date upon which he was released under bail pending the disposition of this writ of habeas corpus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion bt

Rice, P. J.,

The questions raised in this case are precisely the same as those raised in the Jones case in which we herewith file an opinion, ante, p. 185.

The petitioner, William E. Grow, is remanded to the custody of the warden of the Schuylkill county prison To serve out so much of his sentence as had not expired on May 25, 1910, the date upon which he was released under bail pending the disposition of this writ of habeas corpus.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Pa. Super. 193, 1911 Pa. Super. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-murphy-pasuperct-1911.