Commonwealth v. Murphy, C., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Murphy, C., Aplt.

DecidedOctober 15, 2020

Docket741 CAP

StatusPublished

This text of Commonwealth v. Murphy, C., Aplt. (Commonwealth v. Murphy, C., Aplt.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Murphy, C., Aplt., (Pa. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 741 CAP : Appellee : Appeal from the Judgment of : Sentence imposed November 1, : 1990 and re-imposed February 24, v. : 1993, in the Court of Common : Pleas, Philadelphia County, Criminal : Division at No. CP-51-CR-0126101- CRAIG MURPHY, : 1984. (Nunc Pro Tunc rights : reinstated on May 3, 2017.) Appellant :

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: October 15, 2020 AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2020, the appeal is QUASHED. See

Commonwealth v. Reid, 235 A.3d 1124 (Pa. 2020) (quashing serial appeal after

concluding Williams v. Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 136 S.Ct. 1899 (2016), does not

provide exception to timeliness requirements of Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42

Pa.C.S. §§9541-9546, and thus PCRA court lacked jurisdiction to reinstate appellate

rights nunc pro tunc). Appellant’s “Application for Leave to File Post-Submission

Communication” is GRANTED. Appellant’s “Application for Leave to File Supplemental

Briefing Addressing the Jurisdiction of the Court in Light of [Reid]” is DENIED.

Justice Donohue files a concurring statement.

Justice Wecht files a concurring statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI