Commonwealth v. Muniz
135 A.3d 178, 635 Pa. 261
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
1) Does applying [42 Pa.C.S. § 9799.14] retroactively violate the Federal Constitution?
2) Does applying [42 Pa.C.S. § 9799.14] retroactively violate the Pennsylvania Constitution?
The Prothonotary is directed to schedule briefing and argument in this matter together with the following matters presenting related issues: Commonwealth v. Reed, 557 WAL 2014 and Commonwealth v. Gilbert, 181 MAL 2015.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Muniz, 135 A.3d 178, 635 Pa. 261 (Pa. 2016).
135 A.3d 178 (Commonwealth v. Muniz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Com. v. Collaizzi, C
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2020
Com. v. George, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2019
Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.
164 A.3d 1189 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)