Commonwealth v. Muhammad, R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 28, 2023·No. 200 MAL 2023 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 200 MAL 2023 :

Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :

RASHEED MUHAMMAD, : :

Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Was the evidence insufficient to support Petitioner’s conviction for firearms not to be carried without a license, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6106, where the jury made a specific factual finding that Petitioner did not possess a firearm in response to a special interrogatory to which all parties and the trial court had agreed?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Muhammad, R., (Pa. 2023).

Commonwealth v. Muhammad, R. (Commonwealth v. Muhammad, R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 6106
Pennsylvania § 6106