Commonwealth v. Muhammad, R.
This text of Commonwealth v. Muhammad, R. (Commonwealth v. Muhammad, R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 200 MAL 2023 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : RASHEED MUHAMMAD, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Was the evidence insufficient to support Petitioner’s conviction for firearms not to be carried without a license, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6106, where the jury made a specific factual finding that Petitioner did not possess a firearm in response to a special interrogatory to which all parties and the trial court had agreed?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Muhammad, R., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-muhammad-r-pa-2023.