Commonwealth v. Mouzon

15 A.3d 43, 609 Pa. 63, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 376
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 16, 2011·No. 564 EAL 2010·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*64 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of February 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Does the Superior Court’s decision overturning [respondent’s] first-degree murder conviction contradict this Court’s precedent holding that: (A) one who instigates or continues the underlying difficulty may not later claim self-defense; (B) deadly force may not be used against an unarmed victim who is backing away, and thus no longer poses a threat; and (C) even when a prima facie case of self-defense is presented, a trial court has discretion to exclude evidence of a victim’s prior criminal convictions that were remote in time?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Mouzon, 15 A.3d 43, 609 Pa. 63, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 376 (Pa. 2011).

15 A.3d 43 (Commonwealth v. Mouzon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Com. v. Mouzon, D.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
Commonwealth v. Mouzon
53 A.3d 738 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)