Commonwealth v. Moss
This text of 323 N.E.2d 748 (Commonwealth v. Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was no error in the denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence of the revolver which was found in his pocket during a pat-down and which led to his conviction of unlawfully carrying the same on his person. The judge who heard the motion was justified in concluding, on the basis of the surrounding circumstances as disclosed in the evidence, that the pat-down was permissible. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1, 27-31 (1968). Adams v. Williams, 407 U. S. 143,146-149 (1972). Commonwealth v. Ballou, 350 Mass. 751, 755-756 (1966), cert. den. 385 U. S. 1031 (1967). Commonwealth v. Hawkes, 362 Mass. 786, 788-789 (1973). Commonwealth v. Anderson, 366 Mass. 394, 398-401 (1974).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
323 N.E.2d 748, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 711, 1975 Mass. App. LEXIS 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-moss-massappct-1975.