Commonwealth v. Moser

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Moser

391 A.2d 693, 258 Pa. Super. 621

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 12, 1978·No. Appeal, No. 478·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The verdict of guilty is affirmed and the case is remanded for resentencing. At the sentencing, appellant is to receive a sentence which specifies both a minimum and maximum as required by the Act of December 6, 1972, P.L. 1482, No. 334, § 1356(b), added December 30, 1974, P.L. 1052, No. 345, § 1, eff. in 90 days; 18 Pa.C.S. § 1356(b), (Supp.1977). See, Commonwealth v. Marshall, 254 Pa.Super. 275, 385 A.2d 1017 (1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The verdict of guilty is affirmed and the case is remanded for resentencing. At the sentencing, appellant is to receive a sentence which specifies both a minimum and maximum as required by the Act of December 6, 1972, P.L. 1482, No. 334, § 1356(b), added December 30, 1974, P.L. 1052, No. 345, § 1, eff. in 90 days; 18 Pa.C.S. § 1356(b), (Supp.1977). See, Commonwealth v. Marshall, 254 Pa.Super. 275, 385 A.2d 1017 (1978).

Commonwealth v. Moser, 391 A.2d 693, 258 Pa. Super. 621 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

391 A.2d 693 (Commonwealth v. Moser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related