Commonwealth v. Moran
17 A.3d 918, 610 Pa. 3, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 888
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 13, 2011
Docket818 MAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 17 A.3d 918 (Commonwealth v. Moran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Moran, 17 A.3d 918, 610 Pa. 3, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 888 (Pa. 2011).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of April 2011, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
(1) Did the trial judge abuse his discretion in refusing to grant petitioner’s request that the jury be instructed that petitioner cannot be convicted of bribery unless the Commonwealth proves that petitioner acted with criminal intent? Could such an error be harmless in a case where the sole issue was whether petitioner acted with criminal intent?
(2) Was the evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that petitioner was guilty of bribery under 18 Pa.C.S. § 4701 in the respect that there was inadequate proof that petitioner acted with criminal intent?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Moran, Aplt
104 A.3d 1136 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
Scarantino v. Public School Employees' Retirement Board
68 A.3d 375 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)
School District of Philadelphia v. Department of Education
17 A.3d 918 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 A.3d 918, 610 Pa. 3, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-moran-pa-2011.