Commonwealth v. Moorefield

847 A.2d 673, 577 Pa. 561, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1244
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 26, 2004
DocketPetition No. 539 WAL 2003
StatusPublished

This text of 847 A.2d 673 (Commonwealth v. Moorefield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Moorefield, 847 A.2d 673, 577 Pa. 561, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1244 (Pa. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, the Petitioner having sufficiently established that he timely filed his docketing statement, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted, the order of the Superior Court is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court for disposition on the merits. See Commonwealth v. Jones, 549 Pa. 58, 700 A.2d 423 (1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Jones
700 A.2d 423 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
847 A.2d 673, 577 Pa. 561, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-moorefield-pa-2004.