Commonwealth v. Moore

307 A.2d 326, 225 Pa. Super. 735, 1973 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1654
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Moore. Read the opinion of the Court — 225 Pa. Super. 264
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 17, 1973·No. Appeals, Nos. 187 to 189·Published

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellant was convicted on three bills charging aggravated robbery (No. 108), burglary (No. 109), and carrying a firearm without a license (No. 110, second count), and received concurrent sentences on all convictions. The evidence does not sustain a conviction for violation of the Uniform Firearms Act.

The conviction on Bill No. 110, second count, is vacated and the indictment quashed. The record is remanded to the court below for resentence on the valid convictions. Commonwealth v. Lockhart, 223 Pa. Superior Ct. 60, 65, 296 A. 2d 883 (1972).

Wright, P. J. and Watkins, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Moore, 307 A.2d 326, 225 Pa. Super. 735, 1973 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1654 (Pa. Ct. App. 1973).

307 A.2d 326 (Commonwealth v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Lockhart
296 A.2d 883 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)