Commonwealth v. Mooney

110 Mass. 99
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The witness Allen having testified to certain facts tending to prove the guilt of the defendant, it was not competent for the defendant to show what opinion the witness may have had or expressed upon the merits of the case. The fact that he had an opinion that the defendant was innocent would not tend to contradict or impeach him. At most, it only shows the weight he gave to the facts testified to by him as tending to prove the defendant’s guilt, which is for the jury exclusively, and upon which the opinion of witnesses is not competent.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Mooney, 110 Mass. 99 (Mass. 1872).

110 Mass. 99 (Commonwealth v. Mooney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bright v. Wheelock
20 S.W.2d 684 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1929)
Baumberger v. Supreme Hive Ladies of the Maccabees
5 Pa. D. & C. 25 (Washington County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)
Commonwealth v. Duff
139 N.E. 351 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
Smith v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.
96 N.E. 135 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
State v. Crea
76 P. 1013 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1904)
Whipple v. Rich
63 N.E. 5 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
Myers v. State
43 Fla. 500 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1901)
Sweeney v. Kansas City Cable Railway Co.
51 S.W. 682 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)
State v. Davidson
70 N.W. 879 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1897)
McFadin v. Catron
25 S.W. 506 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Crittenden v. Commonwealth
82 Ky. 164 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1884)
Kennedy v. Commonwealth
77 Ky. 340 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1878)