Commonwealth v. Moon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Moon

107 A. 389, 264 Pa. 63, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 593

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 24, 1919·No. Appeal, No. 4·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The first and second assignments complain of the admission of testimony. It was offered and properly received to show malice, hatred and ill will on the part of the prisoner toward the victim of Ms wrath. The remaining assignments, complaining of portions of the charge and answers to points, are utterly without merit, and it remains only to say that the judgment is affirmed, with direction that the record be remitted for the purpose of execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The first and second assignments complain of the admission of testimony. It was offered and properly received to show malice, hatred and ill will on the part of the prisoner toward the victim of Ms wrath. The remaining assignments, complaining of portions of the charge and answers to points, are utterly without merit, and it remains only to say that the judgment is affirmed, with direction that the record be remitted for the purpose of execution.

Commonwealth v. Moon, 107 A. 389, 264 Pa. 63, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 593 (Pa. 1919).

Pincite

107 A. 389 (Commonwealth v. Moon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related