Commonwealth v. Moody

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Moody

79 A.3d 1093

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 7, 2013·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 2013, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. The issues accepted for appeal, as stated by Petitioner with slight modifications, are:

[1094] (1) Did the Superior Court err in ruling ■ that Respondent’s violent in-court conduct was not summary direct criminal contempt because the trial court supposedly did not observe the conduct?

(2) In cases of summary direct criminal contempt, is a defendant entitled to counsel and to call witnesses?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 2013, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. The issues accepted for appeal, as stated by Petitioner with slight modifications, are:

[1094] (1) Did the Superior Court err in ruling ■ that Respondent’s violent in-court conduct was not summary direct criminal contempt because the trial court supposedly did not observe the conduct?

(2) In cases of summary direct criminal contempt, is a defendant entitled to counsel and to call witnesses?

Commonwealth v. Moody, 79 A.3d 1093 (Pa. 2013).

Pincite

79 A.3d 1093 (Commonwealth v. Moody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related