Commonwealth v. Montgomery

537 A.2d 111, 113 Pa. Commw. 421, 1988 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 115
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 12, 1988
DocketAppeal, No. 1117 C.D. 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 537 A.2d 111 (Commonwealth v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Montgomery, 537 A.2d 111, 113 Pa. Commw. 421, 1988 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 115 (Pa. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

The Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT), appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County which sustained the appeal of Harold Montgomery (appellee) from the suspension of his operating privileges. We reverse the order of the court of common pleas and reinstate the suspension of appellees operating privileges.

On October 28, 1984, police officer Joseph Conover of the Abington Township Police Department responded to a call concerning a possible drunken driver. Officer Conover, along with police officer George McReynolds, intercepted the suspect vehicle, operated by appellee, and stopped it. The officers gave appellee some [423]*423field sobriety tests which he foiled to perform to their satisfaction. The officers then took appellee into custody and transported him to the Abington Police Station.

Appellee agreed to submit to a breath best, but upon discovering that the Intoximeter machine was not working properly, he was told that he would be taken to a hospital for a blood test. Appellee refused to take a blood test because he said that he bleeds profusely and has a fear of needles. Officer Conover advised appellee that a refusal would result in an automatic one-year suspension of his drivers license pursuant to Section 1547 of the Vehicle Code, as amended, 75 Pa. C. S. §1547. However, appellee still refused to take a blood test.

In Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Bartle, 93 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 132, 500 A.2d 525 (1985), a case factually similar, we said, “There is nothing in [the act] to indicate that the driver has the option of choosing the test, although he does have the right to have his own physician administer a blood test.” Id. at 134, 500 A.2d at 526.

Accordingly, we reverse the order of the court of common pleas and reinstate the suspension of appellees operating privileges.

Order

Now, February 12, 1988, the order of the Court of Common. Pleas of Montgomery County, in No. 84-19279, dated March 18, 1986, is reversed, and the suspension of the operating privileges of Harold Montgomery is reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Mudd
907 A.2d 1048 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Mooney v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
654 A.2d 47 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Com., DOT, Bur. of Dr. Lic. v. Mease
610 A.2d 76 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
537 A.2d 111, 113 Pa. Commw. 421, 1988 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-montgomery-pacommwct-1988.