Commonwealth v. Montgomery, D.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Montgomery, D.

204 A.3d 360

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 12, 2019·No. 481 EAL 2018 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12 ^th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Did not the Superior Court err, in a published opinion, in holding that a handgun that was only partially tucked into a waistband, with the handle being visible to all, was nonetheless "concealed" for the purposes of the Uniform Firearms Act?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12 ^th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Did not the Superior Court err, in a published opinion, in holding that a handgun that was only partially tucked into a waistband, with the handle being visible to all, was nonetheless "concealed" for the purposes of the Uniform Firearms Act?

Commonwealth v. Montgomery, D., 204 A.3d 360 (Pa. 2019).

Pincite

204 A.3d 360 (Commonwealth v. Montgomery, D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related