Commonwealth v. Monteiro
This text of 418 N.E.2d 346 (Commonwealth v. Monteiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied for the reasons given by the judge in the comprehensive memorandum filed by him. See Commonwealth v. Mobley, 369 Mass. 892, 895-897 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chase, 372 Mass. 736, 741-745 (1977). See also United States v. DeLeo, 422 F.2d 487, 497-498 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1037 (1970).
2. There is no merit to the contention that the indictment should have been dismissed. See Commonwealth v. Robinson, 373 Mass. 591, 592-593 (1977), and cases cited. See also Commonwealth v. McJunkin, ante 609, 613 (1981).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
418 N.E.2d 346, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 984, 1981 Mass. App. LEXIS 1008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-monteiro-massappct-1981.