Commonwealth v. Monteiro

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Commonwealth v. Monteiro

418 N.E.2d 346, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 984, 1981 Mass. App. LEXIS 1008

Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided March 27, 1981·Published

Opinion

1. The defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied for the reasons given by the judge in the comprehensive memorandum filed by him. See Commonwealth v. Mobley, 369 Mass. 892, 895-897 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chase, 372 Mass. 736, 741-745 (1977). See also United States v. DeLeo, 422 F.2d 487, 497-498 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1037 (1970).

2. There is no merit to the contention that the indictment should have been dismissed. See Commonwealth v. Robinson, 373 Mass. 591, 592-593 (1977), and cases cited. See also Commonwealth v. McJunkin, ante 609, 613 (1981).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1. The defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied for the reasons given by the judge in the comprehensive memorandum filed by him. See Commonwealth v. Mobley, 369 Mass. 892, 895-897 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chase, 372 Mass. 736, 741-745 (1977). See also United States v. DeLeo, 422 F.2d 487, 497-498 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1037 (1970).

2. There is no merit to the contention that the indictment should have been dismissed. See Commonwealth v. Robinson, 373 Mass. 591, 592-593 (1977), and cases cited. See also Commonwealth v. McJunkin, ante 609, 613 (1981).

Judgment affirmed.

Commonwealth v. Monteiro, 418 N.E.2d 346, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 984, 1981 Mass. App. LEXIS 1008 (Mass. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

418 N.E.2d 346 (Commonwealth v. Monteiro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related